Posted Under: Behavioral healthcare,General healthcare
On March 21, 2010, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Subsequently, they passed the Reconciliation Act (H.R. 4872) making changes in the original bill. After some maneuvering, all the necessary legislation was passed by both houses of congress and on Tuesday, March 30, 2010, President Obama signed the Healthcare and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010 into law.
In the past week or two I have seen many questions about what the effects of this legislation will be. Behavioral health provider organizations are especially concerned about what the effects will be on mental health and addiction service funding.
One of the most useful resources I have come across was forwarded to the Florida Psychological Association member listserv by Dr. Bob Porter. The Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law has done an excellent job of summarizing the law and its impact on coverage for mental health services. While it will take years for all of the provisions of the new law to be implemented, a Congressional document summarizes some of the immediate effects.
In the private insurance sector, generic requirements of the law have particular impact for those with mental illnesses. In the past, such diagnoses have routinely triggered pre-existing condition clauses in policies. Within the first 6 months, the new law prohibits this discrimination.
- No discrimination against children with pre-existing conditions.
- No rescissions based on developing an illness.
- No lifetime limits on coverage.
- Tightly regulated annual limits on coverage.
In addition, for those who are currently uninsured, the law mandates:
- Immediate help for those with pre-existing conditions (an interim high-risk pool).
- Extending coverage for young people up to their 26th birthday through parents’ insurance.
Since so many who have been diagnosed with mental illnesses or with substance abuse issues have been denied coverage or have had coverage revoked or have reached the limits of their benefits, we should see immediate increased access to behavioral health and addiction services. The ability for parents to keep young adults on their insurance plans until they are 26 years old will assist some of the young people who experience late adolescent onset of serious mental illness or substance abuse conditions. This will allow a period during which their parents will be more able to facilitate transition to some other form of insurance coverage.
The National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare, the trade association of behavioral health community service providers, hosted a webinar on healthcare reform and its impacts, Healthcare Reform: What Happens Next? Additionally, their Public Policy Update for April 1 gives links to resources as well as information about moving forward from here.
I attended the Council’s webinar this week and was struck by a couple of things. Because the Council primarily represents organizations that provide services in the public sector, their information is generally focused in this direction. For me, there were three take-aways from this session, and they were not all for public sector providers:
- The Council believes Fee for Service will probably go away in the long run, to be replaced by Case Rates with a Bonus for improvement of the consumer.
- Behavioral health providers need to position themselves for the long term. Integrated care is likely to be the way of the future and it is best to start to get positioned for that now.
- Private practices can be competitors in the new system; however, those with deep pockets who can manage the whole range of healthcare services will be better positioned to compete.
Community Behavioral Health Organizations (CHBOs) have been working on these steps for the past couple of years and there will be pilot programs using CBHOs together with Federally Qualified Health Programs to start to provide integrated care. Unless private behavioral health practitioners also start to position themselves to play in the Integrated Care setting, they are likely to get left behind.
Even the American Psychological Association’s advocacy efforts focus on the assurance that mental health services will be part of integrated care. This sounds very much like an integration of mental health services into such settings to me.
What do you think about how the new health care reform law will affect behavioral health services? Do you foresee changes in how care is provided? What changes are you willing to make in your organization in order to assure participation in a reformed health care system? Please enter your comment below. If you don’t see the comment box, just click on the title of the article and then enter you comment at the bottom.